Thursday, May 15, 2008

acousma part-2



did i ever tell you how weird he looks when he laughs? of course everyone doesn't have the prettiest face to show. he looks really weird but why? blame it on his parents but on second thoughts its the genes definitely. i don't how they being so pretty could give come up with a progeny who would laugh at the sound of his pompous arrogance exploding in the face of twisted dimensions. but the beauty wasn't in the force with which the exploding arrogance spared its sheath, it was the potential of the disposition to tear though one's ear drums and skin tissue. it was the potential of the state to change a dead body's disposition, from sleeping to soaring, from dormant to tearing. it was the immense potential kept in control by the barrel and transformed into the motion, like a bullet. but that wasn't the beauty still. the beauty was the way everything around had been created to be preserved and yet be torn apart. everything around was desirous of being everlasting and yet vulnerable; vulnerable to being pulverized by force. any form of force would do as long as it could reach down, deep within and set itself like a tumor or simply pierce through. all the pretty ones, the beautiful creatures. the cute pets, the adorable things, the menacingly beautiful women..the woman with beautiful hair..fairy white incandescent bright..the most beautiful thing to him..there...then.. but the beauty wasn't in the woman, or anything.. the beauty was in the smile..no, definitely not. that was my second guess if i were you.no, these were all metaphors..he was a powerful man and a cunning one beneath..obliterating competition and manipulating people and events was his style and his life..everything was a mission to him and he saw that it was accomplished.the beauty was in the expression after that..manic...

2 comments:

rachellespring said...

thats some pretty abstract writing...leaves a lot up to the readers imagination...several interpretations come to my mind...

principled along.. said...

thank you thank you
thats what it is for..open interpretations..its a different style that i have come to terms with.hide from the readers and take them anywhere you want to..its simple after that..misleading them that is.